Clinical Evidence & Decision Support · Assurance Record
OpenEvidence
OpenEvidence · Point of care · Web/mobile app
Decision summary
- Suitable for
- Practicing clinicians (all specialties)
- Documentary gate
- Failed
- Scenario match
- No evaluated buying scenario currently covers this product
- Comparability
- Not yet comparable in this scenario
- Decision readiness
- HISTORICAL — Research only
- Documented evidence
- 0 of 2 evidence claims independently confirmed · confidence Moderate
- Critical unknowns
- scaled production deployment
- Last independent review
- not yet measured
independent reportOpenEvidence, a tool that doctors and nurses have likened to ChatGPT for medicine, planned to announce a $200 million raise at a $6 billion …2025-10-20
Exact claim. OpenEvidence, a tool that doctors and nurses have likened to ChatGPT for medicine, planned to announce a $200 million raise at a $6 billion valuation; the round was led by Google Ventures, with participation from Sequoia Capital, Kleiner Perkins, Blackstone, Thrive Capital, Coatue Management, Bond, and Craft, and its number of clinical consultations per month has nearly doubled to 15 million since July.
- Source
- techcrunch.com
- Type
- independent report
- Published
- 2025-10-20
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-27
- Verification
- unverified
- Confidence
- not stated
- Reviewer
- healthit-gate-v1
- Claim version
- v1
- Supports
- economic_value
- Score contribution
- Feeds economic value
Independent source. Methodology and sample vary by report; read the underlying method.
Open techcrunch.compeer reviewed studyMayo Clinic study in J Prim Care Community Health (2025 Apr 16;16:21501319251332215, doi 10.1177/21501319251332215) found OpenEvidence 'prov…2025-04-16
Exact claim. Mayo Clinic study in J Prim Care Community Health (2025 Apr 16;16:21501319251332215, doi 10.1177/21501319251332215) found OpenEvidence 'provided accurate, evidence-based recommendations in all cases, aligning with physician plans' across five common chronic conditions, with mean scores of clarity 3.55±0.60, relevance 3.75±0.44, support 3.35±0.49, and satisfaction 3.60±0.60.
- Source
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Type
- peer reviewed study
- Published
- 2025-04-16
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-27
- Verification
- unverified
- Confidence
- not stated
- Reviewer
- healthit-gate-v1
- Claim version
- v1
- Supports
- evidence_strength
- Score contribution
- Feeds evidence strength
Peer-reviewed. Check population, setting, and applicability to your workflow before generalizing.
Open pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govVerified provider experience is not yet publishable. Fewer than five independent provider organizations have contributed eligible reviews. Reviewer mode is off. Experience never changes documentary scoring, freshness, or rank.
Buyer lenses — evidence-backed bands (not a 0–100 rank)
Deployment, integration, data handling
- Integration maturity
- announced — Announced or documented integration; marketplace listing not confirmed.
- EHR path
- None (standalone reference)
- FHIR / API
- UNKNOWN
Why unknown
Why. No reliable source on file. The platform does not infer values from weak sources.
What would close it. A primary source or independent verification.
- SSO
- UNKNOWN
Why unknown
Why. Single-sign-on support is not documented in vendor or marketplace materials on file.
What would close it. Vendor security documentation or marketplace listing mentioning SSO/SAML/OIDC.
- PHI / BAA
- No PHI by design (clinician queries only)
- Security attestations
- HIPAA-aligned (no-PHI posture)
- FDA status
- UNKNOWN
Why unknown
Why. No FDA listing found for this product's functions in the tracked category.
What would close it. An FDA 510(k)/De Novo listing, or a clear statement that no regulated function is claimed.
- Pricing
- NPI-verified free access as of 2026
Technical provenance
snap_8a8a4c9bb810aee3 · 2026-08-27T04:05Z · build 6a9fe1b
Forecast calibration is not in the public snapshot — shown as UNKNOWN rather than read from SQLite.
Known limitations
- Deployment traction is UNKNOWN.
Why unknown
Why. No reliable source on file. The platform does not infer values from weak sources.
What would close it. A primary source or independent verification.